Unbiasable

On the record · Updated October 18, 2026

Matthew Van Houten quotes

Tompkins County District Attorney

10 things Matthew Van Houten said, verbatim, from September 30, 2026 to October 14, 2026, each linked to where it ran. Grouped by the questions at issue, with who supported, disputed, or qualified each one.

8stories
10statements
Oct 14latest entry
01

Attorney General Letitia James can fairly investigate the Cornell fraternity case as special prosecutor.

Others on this question

Donald Trump President of the United States Disputes
“I feel badly for whoever she’s looking at because they won’t get a fair shake.”
Letitia James New York Attorney General Supports
“lead a process guided by the facts and the law”
02

Cornell gave the district attorney's office the full picture of its investigation in 2024.

Others on this question

Cornell University university Qualifies

But the school later changed its statement, which now says police investigated in 2024 and “shared the victim’s sworn statement and the Snapchat screenshot” with the district attorney’s office.

Cornell University university Supports

Cornell initially said campus police investigated the allegations in 2024 and “shared all investigatory information with the Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office.”

03

Van Houten's 2024 decision not to charge was sound on the evidence and law he had.

Others on this question

Emily Sack professor of law at Roger Williams University School of Law Disputes
“He never investigated further. He never interviewed her personally.”
Robby Soave Reason writer Supports

they appear to strengthen District Attorney Matthew Van Houten's argument that there was not a compelling legal basis to bring charges against seven members of the Chi Phi fraternity

04

The 2024 criminal investigation was thorough enough to justify not bringing charges against the Chi Phi members.

Others on this question

Mimi Rocah former Westchester County district attorney Disputes
“If you’re an investigator trying to get at the truth, as this DA office should have been, they should have sought more information”
Thomas P. Giuffra attorney for Jane Doe Disputes
“It is challenging for me to understand how a thorough criminal investigation could have been conducted when she never spoke with anyone other than the officer who took her original complaint”
Suri Crow MeidasTouch host Supports

When I first looked at the facts and statements of this story, it made sense to me from a legal and reporter's perspective, which is not necessarily the same as the outrage in the public square or on social media, which has exploded over this story why the Tompkins County DA, Matthew Van Houten, did not pursue criminal charges back in 2024.

05

Cornell police gave the Tompkins County district attorney everything from their 2024 investigation.

Others on this question

Cornell University spokesperson university spokesperson Supports
“The Cornell University Police Department investigated the matter in 2024 and shared all investigatory information with the Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office, which is the established protocol if the department believes it is possible a crime has occurred”

Matthew Van Houten on Courts & the law5

All 146 people on the record on courts & the law ›

People, on the record

Know what they argued, not just what they said.

The daily brief connects each person’s exact words to the question they addressed and the people who answered. Free.

Arrives around 6am ET. Free, and it stays that way.

Cancel anytime. Nothing on the site goes behind a paywall.

One payment through Stripe. No account needed.